Legora vs Spellbook
Both are AI for transactional legal work, but the workflow shapes differ. Spellbook lives natively inside Microsoft Word as a sidebar add-in, from ~$99/user/month with a 7-day trial. Legora is a standalone workspace at ~$3,000/user/year with a 10-seat minimum. Spellbook fits the lawyer redlining one contract at a time; Legora fits the firm running tabular review across a 1,000-document data room. If you don't draft new contracts at all and just need to make sense of what you've already signed, Contracko handles that job specifically.
Quick comparison
Compare pricing, setup time, AI support, deadlines, and integrations.
| Feature | Legora | Spellbook | Contracko |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $ 180/mo | $ 75/mo |
| Pricing model | Custom/Quote-based | Subscription | Bundled users + contract capacity |
| Users included | Per-user pricing | Per-user pricing | Users included |
| Setup time | Not Published (sales-led; IT deployment cycle) | Days-weeks | Minutes |
| Free trial | No | Yes | Yes (7 days) |
| AI assistant | Available | Available | Included |
| AI analysis | Available | Available | Included |
| AI extraction | Available | Available | Included |
| Obligations & deadlines | Not documented | No | Automatic identification + reminders |
| Integrations & API | Limited | Limited | Zapier + API |
Pros and cons comparison
Where each platform is strong, and where teams may run into friction.
Legora
Pros
- Tabular Review and Agent turn folders of contracts into a grid where AI columns extract data across thousands of documents at once
- Trusted by top-tier law firms (White & Case, Cleary Gottlieb, Linklaters, Goodwin) and backed by a $550M Series D at a $5.55B valuation (Mar 2026)
- Enterprise security: ISO 42001, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA. EU-headquartered, with the legal AI built on Anthropic Claude
Cons
- Reported list pricing of $3,000/user/year with a 10-seat minimum puts the floor at $30K, which prices out small and mid teams
- No public pricing or free trial; every buyer enters a sales cycle plus an IT integration
- Built for bulk law-firm workflows (M&A, due diligence over thousands of documents), so it's overkill for in-house teams that just need to triage existing contracts
Spellbook
Pros
- Microsoft Word integration - works where lawyers already work
- Well-funded and growing - $80M raised, $350M valuation
- Zero-retention agreements - data privacy with LLM providers
Cons
- Limited public review presence - N/A G2 score
- Word-only integration - limited to Microsoft ecosystem
- Law firm focus - not optimized for business contract needs
Feature-by-feature breakdown
Core contract management features, compared side by side.
Core contract management
| Feature | Legora | Spellbook | Contracko |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI assistant | Available | Available | Yes Summarize risks, deadlines, and contract context |
| AI analysis | Available | Available | Yes Risks, obligations, gaps, and important terms |
| AI data extraction | Available | Available | Yes Parties, dates, values, and metadata |
| Obligation and deadline tracking | Not documented | No | Yes Automatic identification and reminders |
| Contract repository | Yes | Yes | Yes Centralized & searchable |
| Contract version history | Yes | Yes | Yes Keep primary + supporting files with clear version status |
| Automated expiration reminders | Yes | Yes | Multiple per contract Email & dashboard alerts |
| Calendar integration | No No native 2-way sync | No No native 2-way sync | Google, Apple, Outlook One-click sync |
| Smart Search | Available | Limited | AI-powered Search by concept, not just keywords |
| Role-based access controls | Available | Available | Yes Permission groups with view, edit & full access levels |
Integrations and operations
| Feature | Legora | Spellbook | Contracko |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier workflows | Limited | Limited | Yes Route signed contracts and metadata between tools |
| Contract management API | Limited | Limited | Available Sync intake and metadata from existing systems |
| Reporting and audit context | Limited | No | Available Portfolio status, reminders, and activity context |
| Team collaboration | Available | Available | Users included Access groups, sharing, comments, and role controls |
Pricing & value
| Feature | Legora | Spellbook | Contracko |
|---|---|---|---|
| Users included | No Per-seat pricing | No Per-seat pricing | Users included Add teammates from your plan's included seats, then expand as your team grows |
| Transparent pricing | No Requires sales demo | Yes | Yes No sales calls needed |
| No hidden fees | No Implementation & training fees common | No Features often gated by tier | Yes Predictable plan pricing |
| Free plan available | No | No | No 7-day full feature trial |
Ease of use
| Feature | Legora | Spellbook | Contracko |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick setup | No Weeks to months | Yes | Yes Start in minutes |
| Intuitive interface | No | Yes | Yes Modern, clean UI |
| No training required | No | No | Yes Self-serve onboarding |
Which should you choose?
A quick guide to which platform fits your team best.
Choose Legora if you need:
- Tabular Review and Agent turn folders of contracts into a grid where AI columns extract data across thousands of documents at once
- Trusted by top-tier law firms (White & Case, Cleary Gottlieb, Linklaters, Goodwin) and backed by a $550M Series D at a $5.55B valuation (Mar 2026)
- Enterprise security: ISO 42001, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA. EU-headquartered, with the legal AI built on Anthropic Claude
Choose Spellbook if you need:
- Microsoft Word integration - works where lawyers already work
- Well-funded and growing - $80M raised, $350M valuation
- Zero-retention agreements - data privacy with LLM providers
Choose Contracko if you want:
- AI features included
- Bundled users and contract capacity
- All integrations included
- No setup fees
- Try before annual billing
- 7-day free trial
The bottom line
Both are AI-first legal tools rather than full CLMs — Legora and Spellbook each do native AI analysis and extraction, but Spellbook is pre-signature drafting with no real reporting, no e-sign, and limited search, while Legora adds native smart search. Spellbook lists a per-seat subscription; Legora stays quote-based, and neither offers calendar sync or a true post-signature lifecycle. Contracko covers the whole lifecycle — AI review, extraction, obligation tracking, and native calendar reminders — on published pricing.
- Legora adds native smart search; Spellbook has no reporting
- Spellbook is pre-signature drafting
- Neither offers native calendar sync or full e-signature
Integrate with the tools you already use
Sync your CRM, e-signature or cloud hosting platform to Contracko for automatic intake, and to spreadsheets or cloud hosting for backups.
Effortlessly manage your contracts with AI
Let AI analyze contracts, extract details, answer questions, and surface reminders before deadlines slip.
Where Contracko differs
Contracko focuses on AI review, extracted contract data, reminders, and clear pricing instead of a broad CLM rollout.
Lower total cost
Legora starts at custom pricing and Spellbook at $180. Contracko plans start at $75/month and include both users and contract capacity.
Included users by plan
Unlike Legora's pure per-user pricing, Contracko bundles users and contract capacity into each plan so you can invite teammates without losing pricing predictability.
Smart calendar sync
Automatically sync contract dates to Google Calendar, Apple Calendar, or Outlook. See renewals, expirations, and key dates where you already plan your week.
Frequently asked questions
Questions that usually come up when teams compare Legora and Spellbook.
Explore more comparisons
See how other CLM platforms stack up against each other.
vs 
Legora vs Harvey AI
Both are big-law legal-AI platforms with eight- and nine-figure ARR and overlapping logos, but the price gap is real. Legora lists at ~$3,000/user/year with a 10-seat minimum, a $30K floor. Harvey runs $1,200–$2,000+/seat/month with 20-seat minimums, roughly a $288K+ entry point. Legora wins on Tabular Review for bulk document analysis; Harvey wins on agentic legal research and content partnerships. Contracko is for the in-house team that doesn't need either: parse the contracts you've already signed for dates, obligations, and renewal triggers.
vs 
Legora vs Juro
Legora is a $5.55B-valued legal-AI workspace for Am Law firms at ~$3,000/user/year with a 10-seat minimum. Juro is a self-serve contract automation tool for sales and ops at ~$25/user/month with $18K–$35K typical deals. Legora helps lawyers review thousands of documents; Juro helps non-lawyers spin up new NDAs. If what you actually need is to make sense of the contracts you've already signed, neither is the right shape, and that's the job Contracko was built for.
Effortlessly manage your contracts with AI
Let AI analyze contracts, extract details, answer questions, and surface reminders before deadlines slip.