ContractWorks vs Concord
ContractWorks and Concord both target mid-market teams but approach pricing differently. Both still charge per-user fees and lack the modern AI capabilities that make contract management truly effortless.
Quick comparison at a glance
See how ContractWorks and Concord compare on the metrics that matter most.
| Metric | ContractWorks | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $ 700/mo | $ 499/mo |
| Pricing model | Flat-rate unlimited users | Flat-rate (Bundled Users) |
| Users included | Unlimited | Per-user pricing |
| Setup time | Days | Days/Weeks |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| AI features | Limited | Limited |
Pros and cons comparison
An honest assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each platform.
ContractWorks
Pros
- Simple storage + unlimited users
- 24/7 dedicated support
- Good AI search
Cons
- Limited to storage/repository only
- No workflow automation or in-platform editing
- No native e-signature
Concord
Pros
- Very easy to use (Gmail-like interface)
- Unlimited documents/signatures on all plans
- Quick setup with minimal training
Cons
- Limited customization for complex workflows
- Reporting/Analytics is basic
- Lacks advanced conditional logic
Feature-by-feature breakdown
A detailed comparison of core contract management features between both platforms.
Core contract management
| Feature | ContractWorks | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Contract repository | Yes | Yes |
| AI contract analysis | No | No |
| Automated expiration reminders | Yes | Yes |
| Calendar integration | Limited No native 2-way sync | Limited No native 2-way sync |
| Smart Search | Yes | Yes |
Pricing & value
| Feature | ContractWorks | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Unlimited users | Yes | No Per-seat pricing |
| Transparent pricing | Yes | Yes |
| No hidden fees | No Implementation & training fees common | No Implementation & training fees common |
| Free plan available | No | No |
Ease of use
| Feature | ContractWorks | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Quick setup | Yes | Yes |
| Intuitive interface | No | Yes |
| No training required | No | No |
Why Contracko is the better choice
Get the best of both worlds—powerful features, simple setup, and transparent pricing—without the compromises of traditional CLM platforms.
Drastically lower cost
While ContractWorks starts at $700 and Concord at $499, Contracko provides comprehensive contract management starting at just $11/month with unlimited users.
Unlimited users included
Unlike Concord's per-user pricing, Contracko includes unlimited team members at no extra cost. Invite your entire organization without worrying about escalating fees.
AI-powered analysis included
Get AI contract review, data extraction, and risk analysis built-in at no extra cost—not as an expensive add-on like ContractWorks or Concord.
Smart calendar sync
Automatically sync contract dates to Google Calendar, Apple Calendar, or Outlook. See renewals, expirations, and key dates where you already plan your week.
Ready to simplify your contract management?
Join hundreds of teams who switched from expensive, complex CLM platforms to Contracko.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing ContractWorks and Concord.
Explore more comparisons
See how other CLM platforms stack up against each other.
Concord vs Ironclad
Concord positions itself as a mid-market alternative to Ironclad, but both still require significant investment and have complex feature sets that overwhelm teams looking for straightforward contract management.
ContractWorks vs Ironclad
ContractWorks offers simpler contract management than Ironclad, but still charges per-user fees and lacks modern AI capabilities that small businesses increasingly expect from their CLM tools.
Concord vs PandaDoc
Concord focuses on contract lifecycle management while PandaDoc excels at proposals and sales documents. Neither provides the specialized post-signature contract tracking and AI analysis that growing businesses need.
ContractWorks vs PandaDoc
ContractWorks provides contract repository features while PandaDoc focuses on proposal creation. Both charge per-user fees and lack comprehensive AI-powered contract analysis for post-signature management.