What is the difference between a condition precedent and subsequent?

A condition precedent suspends the contract until an event occurs; a condition subsequent ends an already effective contract when the event occurs.

Does the contract end automatically when the condition is met?

In principle yes, with retroactive effect, though the parties may agree it must be invoked within a stated period.

Can a party rely on its own failure to prevent the condition from being met?

No. Under BW 6:23, a party that in bad faith prevents the fulfilment of a condition is treated as if the condition had been met.

Are payments already made before the condition is triggered recoverable?

Yes, in principle, because the condition has retroactive effect. However, the parties can agree to limit or exclude retroactivity for payments already made or services already performed.

Can multiple conditions subsequent be included in one contract?

Yes. Each should be defined separately with its own trigger, deadline, and invocation right, so the parties always know precisely which condition has fired and what the consequence is.

Conditions Subsequent

Make a contract end automatically if a defined future event occurs.

Ce que c'est

A condition subsequent is a defined future event whose occurrence ends an existing obligation by operation of the contract, for example failure to secure financing or a permit being refused. Until the event occurs, the contract is fully effective.

Pourquoi c'est important

Conditions subsequent let parties commit now while keeping a clean, automatic exit if a key assumption fails. They avoid the need for a termination dispute: the contract simply unwinds when the condition is met.

Comment l'appliquer

Describe the triggering event precisely and the deadline by which it must occur.
State who may invoke the condition and within what period after the event.
Distinguish a condition subsequent from a condition precedent (opschortende voorwaarde).
Address the unwinding: restitution of payments and return of any deliverables.

Conseils de négociation

• Set a clear cut-off date so the contract does not stay in limbo indefinitely.
• Limit who can invoke it to the party the condition is meant to protect.

Pièges courants

• Confusing a suspensive (precedent) with a resolutive (subsequent) condition.
• Leaving the trigger vague, so it is unclear whether the condition has been met.

Références juridiques

Sauf mention contraire, les références renvoient au droit néerlandais (Burgerlijk Wetboek, le Code civil néerlandais) ; les instruments de l'UE tels que le RGPD s'appliquent dans toute l'UE. Il s'agit d'informations générales, pas de conseils juridiques. D'autres juridictions traitent ces concepts différemment. Vérifiez le texte en vigueur et votre situation avec un avocat qualifié.

Foire aux questions

Questions courantes sur cette clause.