Termination for Convenience Clause
Lets a party end the contract without cause, on notice, even if the other side is performing perfectly.
What it is
Termination for convenience allows a party to end the agreement without alleging breach, simply by giving the agreed notice. It contrasts with termination for cause, which requires a default. It is common in services and supply contracts where flexibility is valued.
Why it matters
It provides an exit when needs change, but for the other party it removes revenue certainty. Under Dutch law, even a contractual right to terminate an ongoing agreement is constrained by reasonableness and fairness, sometimes requiring a longer notice period or compensation.
How to apply it
- Set a clear notice period proportionate to the contract's length and the other party's investment.
- Address what is payable on exit: work done, committed costs, wind-down fees.
- Specify the form of notice and the effective termination date.
- State which obligations (confidentiality, payment) survive termination.
Negotiation tips
- • A supplier facing convenience termination should secure exit fees or a minimum term.
- • A customer should keep the notice period short and make the right mutual or one-sided as suits it.
Common pitfalls
- • Assuming a contractual right to terminate overrides the duurovereenkomst notice doctrine.
- • Forgetting to address payment for work in progress at the exit date.
Legal references
- BW 6:248 Reasonableness and fairness (notice of ongoing contracts) Dutch law
- BW 6:2 Good faith in performance Dutch law
Unless marked otherwise, references are to Dutch law (Burgerlijk Wetboek, the Dutch Civil Code); EU instruments such as the GDPR apply across the EU. This is general information, not legal advice. Other jurisdictions treat these concepts differently. Verify the current text and your situation with a qualified lawyer.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about this clause.