Contract management statistics 2026

Most contract management statistics on the web trace back to three or four studies, and almost none of the pages citing them say when the research was done or who paid for it. This page does the opposite. Every number below links to the organization that produced it, carries the year it was measured, and states the sample where the publisher gives one. Numbers we could not trace to a public primary source are listed at the bottom under the statistics we retired, with the reason.

Last verified: September 2026. Refreshed quarterly.

Key takeaways

• Average contract value erosion stands at 8.6%, with the best performers a little over 3% and the worst more than 20% (World Commerce and Contracting with Deloitte, 2023).
• Ineffective agreement management destroys nearly $2 trillion in annual global economic value (Deloitte and Docusign, 2024).
• Companies with disconnected agreement workflows spend an extra 18% of their time on agreements, adding up to more than 55 billion wasted hours a year (Deloitte and Docusign, 2024).
• Contract-related data in a typical large organization sits in 24 different systems (World Commerce and Contracting with Deloitte, 2023).
• 48% of respondents say there is no clarity over who is accountable for the quality and integrity of the contracting or commercial process (World Commerce and Contracting, 2025).
• 62% of chief legal officers name contract management as their most frequently cited technology initiative (Association of Corporate Counsel, 2025).
• 61% of legal departments use contract management tools, behind e-signature at 69% (Association of Corporate Counsel, 2025).
• 30% of law departments have an AI tool implemented and in use, and 54% are considering one within two years (2024 Harbor Law Department Survey, published by CLOC in 2025).
• Gartner predicts 50% of organizations will support supplier contract negotiations with AI-enabled tools by 2027 (Gartner, 2024).
• 30,824 contract actions were commenced in US federal district courts in the 12 months to December 2025 (Administrative Office of the US Courts, 2025 data tables).
• The average North American construction dispute was worth $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve (Arcadis, 2025).
• The US federal government obligated about $793 billion on contracts in fiscal year 2025 (Government Accountability Office, 2025).

How much value do contracts leak?

Companies lose an average of 8.6% of contract value to poor contracting, according to the 2023 study The ROI of Contracting Excellence¹ by World Commerce and Contracting with Deloitte. The same study puts the best performers at a little over 3% and the worst at more than 20%. It draws on 1,236 organizations, with data collected between April 2021 and December 2022.

The figure most roundups quote, 9.2%, is the older number this replaced. World Commerce and Contracting, then named IACCM, measured 9.2% average value erosion in research conducted in 2014, as the 2023 report states in its own opening. Treat 9.2% as the 2014 baseline, not a current estimate.

Erosion of this kind accumulates after signature, in missed milestones and unclaimed entitlements, which is the job that contract tracking software exists to do.

Embed this chart: link to https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics and credit the source named on the chart.

Scaled globally, Deloitte and Docusign put the cost of weak agreement management at "a nearly $2 trillion loss in annual global economic value from lost productivity and revenue opportunities" in Unlocking the Value of Agreement Management², published in 2024. That study surveyed more than 1,000 technology and business leaders across ten countries, plus 17 follow-up interviews.

The same research found that companies with disconnected agreement management workflows spend an extra 18% of their time on agreements. Those inefficiencies add up to over 55 billion hours wasted globally per year. Customer-facing functions such as sales and marketing account for 40% of the global value loss, and support functions for the remaining 60%.

Contract adaptation has a measurable price in public works too. A National Bureau of Economic Research working paper³ on bidding for incomplete contracts estimates that adaptation costs account for about ten percent of the winning bid.

On the other side of the signature, almost nobody reads the terms. A study in the Journal of Legal Studies⁴ by Bakos, Marotta-Wurgler and Trossen tracked 48,154 monthly visitors to 90 online software companies and found that only one or two shoppers per thousand accessed the licence agreement.

Where do companies keep their contracts?

In most large organizations, contract data is scattered rather than centralized. The 2023 World Commerce and Contracting and Deloitte study states that in a typical large organization, contract-related data is held in 24 different systems.

Ownership is equally unclear. The 2025 Benchmark Report⁵ from World Commerce and Contracting reports that 48% of respondents acknowledge there is no clarity over who is accountable for the quality and integrity of the contracting or commercial process, and its own analysis extends that to 70 to 80% of organizations lacking true accountability. The same report records that 88% of executives understand that commercial and contract management excellence matters, and that 87% of organizations are dealing with high levels of uncertainty.

Both numbers describe the same underlying condition, which is that no single system holds the agreements, and a central contract repository is the structural answer to it. Getting the agreements into that repository in the first place is a separate problem, usually solved by contract intake by email.

Embed this chart: link to https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics and credit the source named on the chart.

Tool adoption inside legal departments is better documented than tool consolidation. The 2025 Law Department Management Benchmarking Report⁶ from the Association of Corporate Counsel finds contract management the second most widely adopted legal technology at 61%, behind e-signature at 69% and ahead of artificial intelligence at 52%. That report covers 395 legal departments across 23 industries and 34 countries.

Embed this chart: link to https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics and credit the source named on the chart.

Contract work also stays in house. The same benchmarking report shows contract management handled in-house by over 90% of departments in both 2021 and 2025, with outsourcing to alternative legal service providers rising only from 2% to 5% over that period.

Scattered storage is a tooling problem before it is a discipline problem, and the fix is a single searchable record rather than another folder convention.

How long and complex are contracts getting?

Contracts have become longer and harder to read over the last two decades. The Stanford Material Contracts Corpus paper⁷ by Adelson and Nyarko, published in 2025, assembles over one million contracts filed by public companies with the US Securities and Exchange Commission between 2000 and 2023. The authors report that both contract length and Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level increased across that period. Longer documents are what make a free contract summary tool useful before a full read.

Complexity is not the same as completeness. Nyarko's Stickiness and Incomplete Contracts⁸ in the University of Chicago Law Review finds that choice-of-forum provisions are absent in the majority of half a million material agreements reported to the SEC.

Reading time is the constraint nobody budgets for. Obar and Oeldorf-Hirsch's study in Information, Communication and Society⁹ found participants spent an average of 51 seconds on terms of service that needed 15 to 17 minutes to read, and that 74% skipped the privacy policy entirely. The sample was 543 participants.

How often do contracts end in disputes?

Contract disputes are one of the largest single categories of US federal civil litigation. Table C-2 of the federal judiciary statistical tables¹⁰ records 30,824 contract actions commenced in US district courts in the 12 months ending December 31, 2025, up from 28,392 in the equivalent 2024 period. Insurance is the largest sub-category at 13,654 filings.

Damages are concentrated in a small number of cases. The 2024 Contracts Litigation Report¹¹ from Lex Machina counts 10,253 contract cases filed in federal district courts in 2023, with $13 billion in damages awarded between 2021 and 2023, and 31% of appealed contract cases ultimately reversed.

International commercial arbitration shows a similar pattern of few cases and large sums. The International Chamber of Commerce¹² reported 831 cases filed under its Arbitration Rules in 2024, with an aggregate amount in dispute of US$103 billion, an average of US$130 million and a median of approximately US$5 million. Which forum hears a case of that size is set years earlier, in the dispute resolution clause.

Embed this chart: link to https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics and credit the source named on the chart.

Construction is the sector where contract drafting failures are priced most visibly. The 2025 Construction Disputes Report¹³ from Arcadis puts the average North American dispute value at $60.1 million in 2024, against $43.0 million in 2023. Average resolution time fell to 12.5 months, the lowest in a decade. Errors or omissions in contract documents were the most common cause of disputes for the third consecutive year. Catching those defects before signature is the purpose of a free contract risk analysis tool.

Volume litigation looks different outside the United States. The UK Ministry of Justice's civil justice statistics for October to December 2025¹⁴ record 410,000 money and damages claims in that quarter alone, making up 90% of all civil claims.

Failure at the top end is expensive for the public. The UK National Audit Office's investigation into the government's handling of the collapse of Carillion¹⁵ puts the Cabinet Office's loss on the liquidation at an estimated £148 million, and states that the total cost to the taxpayer will be higher than that.

How big is the contract economy?

Public procurement alone runs to hundreds of billions of dollars a year in the United States. The Government Accountability Office¹⁶ reports that in fiscal year 2025 the federal government committed about $793 billion on contracts, a $17.8 billion increase on fiscal year 2024. Tracking CLINs, option years and performance periods on the supplier side of that spend is covered on the page for federal contractors.

Defense accounts for the largest share of contract actions. The Department of Defense's Federal Procurement Data System page¹⁷ states that DoD reported over 89 million contract actions with obligations over $445 billion to FPDS in FY24.

Individual defense contracts are large enough to be reported one by one. The UK Single Source Regulations Office's annual qualifying defence contract statistics for 2024/25¹⁸ cover 77 contracts with a total estimated price of £13.5 billion and a mean estimated contract profit rate of 9.78 per cent.

Centralized buying is measured against a benefit rate. The Crown Commercial Service Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25¹⁹ records a commercial benefit rate of 10.49% and a spend-related commercial benefit value of £4.6 billion, on £33 billion of public sector direct spend channelled through its agreements. The same report shows £2.3 billion, or 10%, of central government spend going directly to 1,468 small and medium-sized enterprises. The buying side of this work is described on the page for public sector teams.

In Europe, procurement is a measurable share of output. The European Commission's Single Market and Competitiveness Scoreboard²⁰ states that public procurement accounts for about 15% of EU GDP. The Commission's Tenders Electronic Daily service²¹ publishes over 3,000 public procurement notices every day, Monday to Friday.

The people who run this work are a growing occupation. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics²² projects employment of purchasing managers, buyers and purchasing agents to grow 6 percent from 2025 to 2035, with about 53,600 openings projected each year.

Are legal and procurement teams buying contract software?

Contract management is the single most common technology priority named by chief legal officers. The 2025 Chief Legal Officers Survey²³ from the Association of Corporate Counsel reports contract management as the most frequently cited technology initiative at 62%, followed by document management at 32% and workflow tools at 26%. What that priority looks like in practice is set out on the page for general counsel software.

Legal operations teams report the same direction of travel for AI. The 2025 State of the Industry Report²⁴, published by CLOC on data from the 2024 Harbor Law Department Survey, finds 30% of law departments with an AI tool implemented and in use, up from 18% in 2023. The same survey records 54% considering implementation in the next one to two years, up from 40% the year before. It also finds 83% of departments expecting demand for legal services to keep growing, with 63% naming workload and resource bandwidth as their top challenge. Harbor ran the survey, now in its 21st year, and it covers 186 organizations across 14 countries and more than 15 industries. Bandwidth pressure of that kind is the starting point for in-house legal teams assessing tooling.

Embed this chart: link to https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics and credit the source named on the chart.

Contracting-specific AI adoption tracks close behind. World Commerce and Contracting's Trusted Contract Data²⁵ research reports that 42% of organizations are now adopting or implementing AI in the contracting process.

Buyers expect to spend more. The 2024 Deloitte and Docusign study found that two out of five companies are looking for solutions with smarter capabilities, and that more than half plan to increase spending on agreement management solutions over the next three years.

Maturity correlates with performance, at least by self-report. The 2025 Deloitte and Docusign Digital Agreement Management Study²⁶, based on more than 1,400 business leaders globally, reports that organizations with advanced obligation and renewal management capabilities are 31% more likely to say they outperform their strategic goals.

Analyst forecasts point the same way. Gartner predicted in May 2024²⁷ that by 2027, 50% of organizations will support supplier contract negotiations through AI-enabled contract risk analysis and editing tools, drawing on a November 2023 survey of 101 procurement leaders.

For a practical view of what teams actually track once software is in place, see the guide to contract management KPIs.

How accurate is AI at contract review?

The best public evidence on model accuracy comes from benchmark datasets rather than vendor demonstrations. The Better Call GPT study²⁸ by Martin and colleagues, run by the Onit AI Centre of Excellence and published in 2024, reports that advanced models match or exceed human accuracy in determining legal issues, at a 99.97 percent reduction in cost over traditional methods. This is a vendor-run experiment, so read it alongside independent benchmarks rather than on its own.

The standard labelled dataset for clause extraction is public. CUAD²⁹, released by Hendrycks and colleagues in 2021 with The Atticus Project, contains over 13,000 expert annotations across 510 commercial contracts and 41 clause types.

Benchmarks of this shape describe the same task that AI contract analysis performs on a live portfolio. The clause-level extraction those datasets measure is also what a contract data extraction platform turns into structured output.

A newer benchmark tests retrieval rather than extraction. ACORD³⁰, presented at ACL in 2025, includes 114 queries and over 126,000 query-clause pairs, each ranked on a scale from one to five stars.

We deliberately do not cite the 2018 vendor study that reported 94% AI accuracy against 85% for lawyers on non-disclosure agreements. It was produced by a contract review vendor, it is eight years old, and the underlying data has never been published.

How big is the contract software market?

Market estimates for contract lifecycle management software disagree by more than 60% for the same year, so quote the spread rather than a single number.

• Fortune Business Insights³¹ valued the global CLM solution market at USD 1.84 billion in 2025, projecting USD 5.09 billion by 2034 at a CAGR of 11.90%.
• IMARC Group³² put the market at USD 2.6 billion in 2025, reaching USD 5.7 billion by 2034 at a CAGR of 9.20%.
• Precedence Research³³ put it at USD 2.96 billion in 2025, reaching around USD 8.84 billion by 2035 at a CAGR of 11.56%.
• Mordor Intelligence³⁴ estimates USD 3.39 billion in 2026, growing from USD 3.0 billion in 2025 to USD 6.26 billion by 2031 at a CAGR of 13.06%.

Embed this chart: link to https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics and credit the source named on the chart.

The gap is a definition problem, not a measurement error. Each firm draws the boundary of "contract lifecycle management" differently, includes or excludes e-signature and adjacent procurement modules, and models private company revenue with its own method. None of these estimates is auditable from outside the publisher, so use them to show direction and never as a precise figure. Where Contracko sits against the enterprise and mid-market products these firms are counting is set out on the contract management alternatives page.

Which contract statistics are outdated or unverifiable?

These numbers circulate widely and we could not trace any of them to a public primary source. We do not publish them, and we list them here so they can be avoided elsewhere.

Claim	Usually attributed to	Why we retired it
71% of companies cannot locate at least 10% of their contracts	"Journal of Contract Management", circa 2008	No page links the original, and the journal issue is not publicly available
A simple contract costs $6,900 and a complex one $49,000	Variously Goldman Sachs or World Commerce and Contracting	No published document contains either figure; the attribution changes by page
95% of organizations lack full obligation visibility	IACCM, undated	No report, year or sample has ever been named
Automation saves 82% of routine legal task time	Attributed to Reuters, otherwise unsourced	No matching Reuters publication exists
Only 11% rate their contract management as very effective	World Commerce and Contracting	Every citing page names the association but none links a report
Up to 40% of a contract's value is lost without governance	KPMG outsourcing survey, circa 2012	Fourteen years old, and KPMG's own later benchmark gives a materially lower figure
50% of procurement contract management will be AI-enabled by 2024	Gartner	The forecast window has expired; the current Gartner forecast is 2027
AI reviews NDAs at 94% accuracy versus 85% for lawyers	Vendor study, 2018	Vendor-produced, eight years old, underlying data unpublished
9.2% of revenue lost to poor contract management, presented as current	IACCM	Correct for 2014, superseded by the 8.6% figure measured for the 2023 report

Methodology and last verified date

A statistic qualifies for this page when four conditions hold. The number must appear on a page published by the organization that produced it. The year the data was collected must be stated or derivable. The publisher must name a sample, a dataset, or an administrative record behind the figure. The source must be publicly reachable without a paywall or a login.

The retirement section above is a ninth question-style section, one more than this page format normally carries. It is a deliberate exception, because naming the statistics that fail the test is the point of the page.

We exclude press wires, news re-reports, other vendors' statistics roundups, encyclopaedias and data aggregators, and any page whose own citation is the real source. Where a research firm sells the full report, we cite only figures the firm publishes on its own site. Where a vendor commissioned or ran the research, we say so in the sentence.

Two figures we wanted are not on this page because the number is not in the public text. These are recorded in our verification file rather than published: the country-level 2024 indicator values in the EU Single Market Scoreboard dashboard, which exist only inside an interactive chart, and the percentage of organizations keeping all executed contracts exclusively in a contract lifecycle management system, which sits inside a gated World Commerce and Contracting report.

Last verified: September 2026. Next review: December 2026. We recheck every link and figure each quarter, correct any number the publisher has revised, and record what changed.

Changelog:

• September 2026: first publication. Replaced the widely quoted 9.2% erosion figure with the 8.6% figure measured for the 2023 study and labelled 9.2% as the 2014 baseline. Retired nine circulating statistics that could not be traced to a primary source. Corrected the 2024 ICC caseload to 831 cases and US$103 billion. Added US federal court, GAO, UK SSRO, Crown Commercial Service and European Commission data, which no comparable page currently cites.

The same discipline applies to a single company's own contract data rather than to industry averages. Contracko extracts dates, parties, values and obligations from uploaded contracts and tracks them in one place. Plans and a free trial are listed on the Contracko pricing page. The contract management best practices guide covers the process side of the same work.

How to cite this page

Preferred citation format:

Contracko. "Contract management statistics: verified figures with primary sources." Last verified September 2026. https://contracko.com/blog/contract-management-statistics

A single statistic taken from this page should be credited to the original publisher named in the sentence, with a link to that publisher's page rather than to this one. This page is the right citation for the compilation itself, the retirement list, or the reconciliation of market estimates.

Sources

Every figure on this page links to the organisation that produced it. Sample sizes, collection periods and record types are stated so a reader can judge each number.

Footnotes

1. World Commerce and Contracting with Deloitte. The ROI of Contracting Excellence, deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone3/us/en/docs/services/tax/2024/us-tax-roi-of-contracting-excellence.pdf, 2023. What it is: survey of 1,236 organizations, with data collected between April 2021 and December 2022. Accessed September 2026. ↩

2. Deloitte and Docusign. Unlocking the Value of Agreement Management, deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone3/us/en/docs/services/tax/2024/us-tax-unlocking-the-value-of-agreement-management.pdf, 2024. What it is: survey of more than 1,000 technology and business leaders across ten countries, with 17 supplementary interviews, run by the two publishers. Accessed September 2026. ↩

3. National Bureau of Economic Research. Bidding for incomplete contracts, nber.org/papers/w12051, working paper 12051, 2006. What it is: econometric study of public works procurement auctions, published as an NBER working paper; we did not record its sample size. Accessed September 2026. ↩

4. Bakos, Marotta-Wurgler and Trossen. Does anyone read the fine print?, journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/674424, Journal of Legal Studies, 2014. What it is: peer-reviewed study of clickstream data covering 48,154 monthly visitors to 90 online software companies. Accessed September 2026. ↩

5. World Commerce and Contracting. 2025 Benchmark Report, info.worldcc.com/benchmark-2025, 2025. What it is: association benchmark survey; the public page states no sample size and no fielding date. Accessed September 2026. ↩

6. Association of Corporate Counsel. 2025 Law Department Management Benchmarking Report, acc.com/sites/default/files/2025-06/ACC_2025_Law_Department_Management_Benchmarking_Report.pdf, 2025. What it is: survey of 395 legal departments across 23 industries and 34 countries. Accessed September 2026. ↩

7. Stanford. The Stanford Material Contracts Corpus, arxiv.org/html/2504.02864v1, Adelson and Nyarko, 2025. What it is: dataset of over one million contracts filed with the SEC between 2000 and 2023, posted as a preprint. Accessed September 2026. ↩

8. Nyarko. Stickiness and incomplete contracts, lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/Nyarko_IncompleteContracts_88UCLR1.pdf, University of Chicago Law Review, volume 88. What it is: law review study of half a million material agreements filed with the SEC. Accessed September 2026. ↩

9. Obar and Oeldorf-Hirsch. The biggest lie on the internet, tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870, Information, Communication and Society, 2020. What it is: peer-reviewed study of 543 participants. Accessed September 2026. ↩

10. US Courts. Table C-2, statistical tables for the federal judiciary, uscourts.gov/data-news/data-tables/2025/12/31/statistical-tables-federal-judiciary/c-2, 2026. What it is: administrative record of civil cases commenced in US district courts, for the 12-month periods ending December 31, 2024 and 2025. Accessed September 2026. ↩

11. Lex Machina. 2024 Contracts Litigation Report, lexisnexis.com/community/pressroom/b/news/posts/lex-machina-releases-2024-contracts-commercial-litigation-report, 2024. What it is: platform data covering US federal district court dockets, for cases filed in 2023 and damages awarded 2021 to 2023; this URL is the producer's own announcement, because the full report is gated. Accessed September 2026. ↩

12. International Chamber of Commerce. 2024 ICC arbitration and ADR preliminary statistics, iccwbo.org/news-publications/news/unveiled-2024-icc-arbitration-and-adr-preliminary-statistics, 2024 data. What it is: administrative record of the institution's own caseload, covering cases filed in 2024. Accessed September 2026. ↩

13. Arcadis. 2025 Construction Disputes Report, media.arcadis.com/-/media/project/arcadiscom/com/expertise/global/contract-solutions/2025/2025-15th-annual-construction-disputes-report-final-19jun25.pdf, 2025. What it is: industry survey run by the Arcadis North America Contract Solutions team, covering disputes in 2024, North America only; the report states no respondent count. Accessed September 2026. ↩

14. UK Ministry of Justice. Civil justice statistics quarterly, October to December 2025, gov.uk/government/statistics/civil-justice-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2025/civil-justice-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2025, 2026. What it is: official statistics covering claims issued in the October to December 2025 quarter. Accessed September 2026. ↩

15. UK National Audit Office. Investigation into the government's handling of the collapse of Carillion, nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Investigation-into-the-governments-handling-of-the-collapse-of-Carillion.pdf, HC 1002, June 2018. What it is: public audit investigation report examining government and Official Receiver records on the liquidation. Accessed September 2026. ↩

16. US Government Accountability Office. Snapshot of government-wide contracting for FY 2025, gao.gov/blog/snapshot-government-wide-contracting-fy-2025-interactive-dashboard, 2025. What it is: official statistics drawn from federal contract obligation records, covering fiscal year 2025. Accessed September 2026. ↩

17. US Department of Defense. Federal Procurement Data System, acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/cap/fpds.html, Defense Pricing and Contracting, 2025. What it is: administrative record of contract actions reported to FPDS, covering fiscal year 2024. Accessed September 2026. ↩

18. UK Single Source Regulations Office. Annual qualifying defence contract statistics 2024/25, gov.uk/government/publications/annual-qualifying-defence-contract-statistics-2024-25/annual-qualifying-defence-contract-statistics-202425, 2025. What it is: official statistics compiled from statutory contract reports, covering the 77 contracts that became qualifying defence or sub-contracts in 2024/25. Accessed September 2026. ↩

19. UK Crown Commercial Service. Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25, assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6878b417a52cca025ef5bd81/HC1091_CCS_AR_A_24_25_Certified.pdf, HC 1091, 2025. What it is: audited annual report and accounts laid before Parliament, covering the 2024/25 financial year. Accessed September 2026. ↩

20. European Commission. Single Market and Competitiveness Scoreboard, public procurement, single-market-scoreboard.ec.europa.eu/business-framework-conditions/public-procurement_en, 2025. What it is: official statistics, reporting period January to December 2024. Accessed September 2026. ↩

21. European Commission. Tenders Electronic Daily, ted.europa.eu/en/about-ted, 2026. What it is: administrative record of the EU public procurement notice register, describing its own publication volume. Accessed September 2026. ↩

22. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Purchasing managers, buyers and purchasing agents, bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/purchasing-managers-buyers-and-purchasing-agents.htm, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2026. What it is: official statistics, employment projections for 2025 to 2035. Accessed September 2026. ↩

23. Association of Corporate Counsel. 2025 Chief Legal Officers Survey, acc.com/resource-library/2025-acc-chief-legal-officers-survey, 2025. What it is: survey of chief legal officers; the producer page returns an error to automated retrieval, so we did not confirm its sample size. Accessed September 2026. ↩

24. CLOC and Harbor. 2025 CLOC State of the Industry Report, cloc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2025-CLOC-2025-SOTI-Report.pdf, 2025. What it is: survey of 186 organizations across 14 countries and more than 15 industries, run by Harbor as the 2024 Harbor Law Department Survey, now in its 21st year, and published by CLOC. Accessed September 2026. ↩

25. World Commerce and Contracting. Trusted Contract Data, info.worldcc.com/trusted-contract-data. What it is: association research report; the public page states no sample size, no fielding date and no publication date. Accessed September 2026. ↩

26. Deloitte and Docusign. 2025 Digital Agreement Management Study, deloitte.com/us/en/services/tax/articles/digital-agreement-management-study.html, 2025. What it is: survey of more than 1,400 business leaders globally, run by the two publishers. Accessed September 2026. ↩

27. Gartner. Gartner predicts half of procurement contract management will be AI-enabled by 2027, gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-05-08-gartner-predicts-half-of-procurement-contract-management-will-be-ai-enabled-by-2027, May 2024. What it is: analyst forecast, published alongside a survey of 101 procurement leaders conducted in November 2023. Accessed September 2026. ↩

28. Martin et al. Better Call GPT: comparing large language models against lawyers, arxiv.org/abs/2401.16212, 2024. What it is: benchmark experiment run by the Onit AI Centre of Excellence and posted as a preprint, comparing model and human accuracy on a labelled contract set; it is vendor-run research and the preprint is not peer-reviewed. Accessed September 2026. ↩

29. Hendrycks et al. CUAD: an expert-annotated NLP dataset for legal contract review, arxiv.org/abs/2103.06268, 2021. What it is: peer-reviewed dataset of over 13,000 expert annotations across 510 commercial contracts and 41 clause types. Accessed September 2026. ↩

30. Association for Computational Linguistics. ACORD: an expert-annotated retrieval benchmark for legal contract drafting, aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1206, 2025. What it is: peer-reviewed benchmark dataset of 114 queries and over 126,000 expert-ranked query-clause pairs. Accessed September 2026. ↩

31. Fortune Business Insights. Contract Lifecycle Management Solution Market, fortunebusinessinsights.com/contract-lifecycle-management-clm-solution-market-106472, 2026. What it is: commercial market estimate; the publisher states no sample or method on the public page. Accessed September 2026. ↩

32. IMARC Group. Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market, imarcgroup.com/contract-lifecycle-management-software-market, 2026. What it is: commercial market estimate; the publisher states no sample or method on the public page. Accessed September 2026. ↩

33. Precedence Research. Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market, precedenceresearch.com/contract-lifecycle-management-software-market, 2026. What it is: commercial market estimate; the publisher states no sample or method on the public page. Accessed September 2026. ↩

34. Mordor Intelligence. Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market, mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/contract-lifecycle-management-software-market, 2026. What it is: commercial market estimate; the publisher states no sample or method on the public page. Accessed September 2026. ↩